Looking for a Lifestack alternative
Lifestack schedules around your energy, not just your deadlines. Here's what that costs if energy modeling isn't the problem you're trying to solve.
Lifestack isn't quite the same kind of tool as the other four alternatives covered on this site. Where Motion, Reclaim, SkedPal and FlowSavvy all place tasks by duration, priority and deadline, Lifestack also reads sleep, recovery and energy data from a connected wearable or Apple Health and uses it to decide when demanding work actually happens, rather than scheduling purely off the numbers you typed in. If the plain duration-and-deadline approach has never quite matched how tired you actually are on a given morning, Lifestack is worth understanding on its own terms rather than folded into a feature table built for the other four.
What the energy layer actually does
Lifestack's core mechanic matches a task's category, deep work against a light task, to where your energy curve says you actually have the capacity for it, built from the sleep, recovery and energy data a connected wearable or Apple Health supplies. "Plan Entire Day with AI" scans your calendar, tasks and routines and produces a structured day: focus blocks where your energy is expected to be highest, light tasks where it isn't, with breaks, meals and wind-down time placed around them rather than left for you to remember. "Plan Your Week with AI" does the same thing across a full week and explicitly aims to spread work across days rather than letting several demanding tasks land on the same one.
Routines, workouts and meals among them, get their own fixed time slot and duration ahead of tasks, so the plan treats a habit you've already committed to as a constraint the rest of the day works around, a different starting point from a scheduler that treats every item as equally negotiable until you say otherwise.
A swipe instead of a recalculate button
Every tool in this category replans when something changes, but how it asks for your approval differs more than the marketing copy suggests. FlowSavvy waits for you to press recalculate. Motion, Reclaim and SkedPal replan automatically and just show you the result. Lifestack's "Auto Update Your Plan" replans continuously too, but presents each proposed change individually, swipe right to accept it and left to discard it, rather than applying every change silently or bundling them into one recalculation you either accept wholesale or ignore.
Whether that is an improvement depends on how much you trust the model behind it. Reviewing each change gives you a veto Motion and Reclaim do not build in, and it costs you the one thing silent replanning buys, which is not having to think about the schedule at all. Lifestack also takes plain-language adjustments, "free up my afternoon" or "make Friday lighter", and re-optimizes the existing plan around them, a request format none of Motion, Reclaim, SkedPal or FlowSavvy expose.
Pricing: no free tier, but the only lifetime option here
Lifestack has no forever-free tier. It runs seven dollars a month, fifty dollars a year with a seven-day trial on the yearly plan only, or a hundred and twenty dollars once as a lifetime purchase, the one pricing shape none of Motion, Reclaim, SkedPal or FlowSavvy offer. If you are confident this is the tool you want for years rather than months, the lifetime price undercuts every subscription in this category within two years of paying it, a genuinely different trade than any of the monthly or annual plans elsewhere in this comparison.
What is missing if you just want a to-do list turned into a calendar
Nothing in Lifestack's public pages or support docs describes task prerequisites, the ability to say one task cannot start until another finishes, which Hourwright includes at every price. Splitting one long task across several sittings was not found either, though Lifestack's own docs do not rule it out explicitly, so treat that one as unconfirmed rather than absent. Apple Calendar and Notion Calendar are both listed as "coming soon" rather than shipped, so if your calendar is iCloud rather than Google or Outlook, Lifestack is not an option today regardless of how you feel about energy-based scheduling. No team or multi-user support was found either, which matters less here than it does elsewhere in this comparison series, since Lifestack's whole design points at one person managing their own energy rather than at coordinating anyone else's.
None of that is a flaw exactly, it is a consequence of what Lifestack is actually for. A tool built around energy and recovery data is solving a more specific problem than placing tasks automatically, and someone who just wants a to-do list turned into a calendar without connecting a wearable or trusting an energy model is asking Lifestack to be something it was not primarily built to be.
Moving from Lifestack, if you decide to
Tasks that arrived in Lifestack through a connected app, Todoist, Trello, TickTick, GitHub, Apple Reminder, ClickUp or Google Tasks among the seven it supports, already live in that source app, so they survive a Lifestack cancellation without any action on your part. What does not carry over as easily is a native Lifestack task, one created directly inside it with its own duration, recurring rule and sub-tasks, since nothing on its public pages describes an export for those; expect to re-enter them by hand in whatever replaces it.
Routines, the fixed-slot workout and meal bookings, and the energy-based placement logic itself have no equivalent in Hourwright, so if the wearable-driven scheduling is specifically what you would miss, nothing here replaces it. Events Lifestack has already written to Google Calendar or Outlook stay there as ordinary events once you disconnect it, so nothing currently on your calendar disappears; it simply stops being maintained by Lifestack going forward.
Where Hourwright sits
Hourwright places tasks by duration, priority and due date, the numbers you give it, rather than by a health or energy model you have to connect and trust, and it costs three euros a month after a 31-day trial that needs no card, with no lifetime option. Task prerequisites are included at that one price, which Lifestack does not have; native mobile apps and a Chrome extension are not, which Lifestack does. Hourwright re-plans when you ask it to rather than continuously, so there is no swipe-through review queue to keep up with, for better or worse depending on which side of that trade-off you are on.
This guide and the table below are where Lifestack itself gets checked row by row. The comparison page has the same kind of detail against Motion, Reclaim, SkedPal and FlowSavvy, and Best automatic task schedulers sets all six of these tools, Lifestack included, against each other by situation rather than by feature count.
| Feature | Us | Lifestack |
|---|---|---|
| Scheduling basis | Duration, priority, due date | Sleep, recovery and energy data, plus duration |
| Task prerequisites | Yes, included | No (not found) |
| Continuous auto-replan | No, manual re-run | Yes, each change reviewed by swipe |
| Calendar providers | Google only | Google, Outlook (iCloud "coming soon") |
| Free tier (not a trial) | No, 31-day trial only | No, 7-day trial on yearly plan only |
| One-time lifetime purchase | No, subscription only | Yes, $120 |
| Entry price | €3/mo | $7/mo, $50/yr, or $120 lifetime |
Hourwright is three euros a month after a 31-day trial that needs no card. The comparison page covers where it falls short of the alternatives, and the features page covers what it does.